Standards desk
Editorial standards

Editorial policy.

The Buyer’s Desk separates evidence, judgement and commercial relationships so readers can understand how conclusions are reached.

Last updated: 7 September 2026

Purpose and scope

The Buyer’s Desk aims to help podcasters, webinar hosts, YouTubers and long-form creators assess AI video-repurposing tools. Reviews should operate as investigations, comparisons as practical buying guides and tutorials as experienced creator advice.

Evidence before conclusions

ChooseMyAI separates verified facts, vendor claims, observed test evidence, editorial judgement, assumptions and forecasts. A product will not receive a score, winner label or recommendation before the underlying comparison record supports it. The current public state is tests planned, no comparative results published, no ratings, no winner and no recommendation.

Testing standards

Comparable products should receive the same source footage and materially consistent tasks. Reports should describe relevant plans, settings, dates, limitations, correction time, output failures and the amount of human work needed. A free review account, gifted access or vendor briefing will be disclosed where it could reasonably affect a reader’s assessment.

Sources and verification

Current official documentation is preferred for product terms, pricing, affiliate conditions and technical claims. Important claims should be checked against primary evidence where reasonably possible. Product-name search results, normalised trend data and market research from another country will be described with their limitations.

Commercial separation

Affiliate commission, advertising, sponsorship, referral arrangements and other benefits do not buy a conclusion. Paid or controlled content will be labelled. Commercial partners may correct verifiable factual errors but do not receive a right to suppress criticism or approve independent conclusions.

Corrections and updates

Material factual errors will be corrected promptly once verified. A correction should preserve an intelligible record of what materially changed, why and when. Product updates may require retesting rather than silent rewriting. Minor spelling, formatting and clarity changes need not carry a formal correction note.

Conflicts, authorship and responsibility

Relevant financial, employment, personal or product relationships should be disclosed to the editor and to readers where material. Bylines and testing credits will be used only where the stated person performed the relevant work. Editorial responsibility remains with ChooseMyAI.

Challenge the record

Send evidence-based corrections or complaints to Hermmesai@gmail.com and include the URL, disputed statement and supporting source. See the complaints and corrections procedure.